We seek to identify, with reference to our services, the circumstances that constitute or may give rise to a conflict of interest entailing a risk of damage to the interests of one or more clients.
A potential conflict would exist if a third party product provider or supplier had a material shareholding or financial interest in the Raymond James (or vice versa), of a size significant enough to be able to influence the operating decisions of the firm to the detriment of the client interests. At the date of these Terms, the group has no close links to product providers or insurers, other than with respect to the Raymond James OEIC range. If circumstances were to change and such close links arose, we would review the situation carefully to identify and appropriately manage any potential conflict.
Our firm provides full-service wealth management, including discretionary and advisory managed portfolios, advisory and execution-only services and fund management, with
investment management services also being provided through the discretionary managed model portfolios hosted on third-party investor and Independent Financial Adviser platforms. We (or a Person connected with us) may be the trustee or operator (or an adviser to the trustee or operator) of a collective investment scheme or other Retail Investment Product in which you are advised to invest, or in which discretionary transactions are arranged for you if you are a Discretionary Client. We are cognisant of the potential for conflict between providing investment management services and offering in-house funds, the primary mitigating factor of which is the absence of incentives for investment management staff to recommend in-house funds.
Our group Remuneration Policy sets out how we seek to comply with our regulatory obligations regarding executive and staff remuneration and group remuneration schemes, including the consideration of potential conflicts within our incentive schemes. Where staff are remunerated by reference to business volumes, there is potential for conflict with client interests as such remuneration schemes may provide an incentive to maximise revenues at the expense of clients’ interests. It is our policy to assess incentives-based conduct risks and factor these into internal control and monitoring routines. Additional policies are designed to counter any incentives to engage in poor behaviours. Staff are not permitted to receive any payments from clients directly.
Staff personal interests in holdings of securities, or in dealing in securities, may conflict with their obligations to clients. For example, when we give you investment advice or (if you are a Discretionary Client) arrange a discretionary transaction on your behalf, staff or connected persons may have an interest, relationship or arrangement that is material in relation to the Investment, transaction or service concerned. We have policies, procedures and monitoring arrangements in place to review staff personal dealing and to restrict it in certain circumstances.
Staff may not accept any employment or business interest outside the group without prior approval from management.
As a matter of policy, our firm and staff do not solicit or accept inducements that could conflict with our obligations to its clients, nor offer nor give inducements that could conflict with the recipient’s obligations to its own clients. Gifts, corporate hospitality and similar benefits may fall within this category and we maintain a Gifts & Hospitality Policy and Procedure detailing the requirements around the giving and receiving of gifts and hospitality.
A potential conflict exists in that it may be to our benefit to categorise clients as Professional rather than Retail Clients, thereby reducing the level of investor protection enjoyed by
clients. Policies and procedures are in place to ensure that clients are only categorised as Professional when this is fully justified in all the circumstances and permitted by the FCA Rules
on client categorisation. Otherwise, clients are categorised as Retail Clients.
When we recommend a transaction to you or enter into a transaction for you, conflicts may exist where:
Our main sources of income are fees and trading commissions from our investment management, and advisory and trade execution activities and the commercial requirements of these businesses can create conflicts of interest for research analysts, as the desire to maximise trading commissions can conflict with the requirement for analysts to provide high quality, timely and unbiased recommendations to investing clients. Raymond James and its connected companies, their directors, members, staff and members of their families may have positions in the securities of Financial Instruments referred to in our research. Under our Research Analysts Policy, analysts giving advice on or making a recommendation about security are required to disregard any relationship, arrangement or interest of their own or of our firm, which might influence the advice or recommendation. Our Research Analysts Policy sets out detailed standards for analysts, both as regards their own conduct and the disclosure of potential or actual conflicts within research publications. Our policy on managing actual or potential conflicts of interest in respect of research
Raymond James, Charles Stanley and Charles Stanley Direct are trading names of Raymond James Wealth Management Limited.
Raymond James Wealth Management Limited (formerly Charles Stanley & Co. Limited) and Raymond James Investment Services Limited have been brought together to form a single UK business operating under Raymond James Wealth Management. This combined business brings together the experience and expertise of both firms within one UK company and continues their long-standing commitment to providing high quality client service.
As we continue to integrate these businesses, we will share information relevant to the services we provide and your arrangements with us. If you are unsure whether any information applies to you, please contact your wealth manager or our client support team.